|
Cantron® is the World's
Most Effective Antioxidant Compound
|
|
Independent laboratory tests demonstrate
that Cantron® has superior efficacy in regard to scavenging
all health damaging species of free radicals including:
|
|
•
Hydroxyl
**Radicals
• Peroxyl hydro
**Radicals
• Peroxyl lipo
**Radicals
• Peroxynitrite
**Radicals
• Superoxide
**Radicals |
|
The results of recent studies
conducted by Brunswick Laboratories – the world’s
leading testing facility of antioxidants - demonstrate
that Cantron® is the planet’s most potent free
radical scavenger. This is great news for those who wish
to prevent or reverse serious health conditions. It is
head and shoulders above all other antioxidants in its
ability to scavenge a wide range of the dangerous “Reactive
Oxygen Species” of free radicals that are responsible
for multitudes of diseases in mankind. It is, in fact,
522 times more effective than the vitamin E test standard
on peroxyl radicals, 417 times more effective than the
vitamin C standard and 282 times more effective than orange
juice. On hydroxyl radicals it is 52 times more effective
than the Caffeic acid test standard, and 68 times more
effective than green tea. It is 33 times more effective
than the peroxynitrite radical standard. Its powerful
scores against superoxide anions cannot be compared due
to the nature of the test.
|
Continue Below
|
to read our detailed antioxidant report

|
*********************************************
Cantron®: Its
Beneficial Role Against Health Damaging Free Radicals
|
|
A
study and comprehensive discussion of the
antioxidant power of Cantron®
including all versions and variations such
as Entelev, Cancell and Protocel. |
|
|
All tests perfomed at Brunswick
Laboratories and Cayman Laboratories
Original Research Project
overseen by Daniel Hetrick PhD in 2003. The New
"Advanced Scientific Version" of Cantron
was tested in July 2007.
Research report and
discussions compiled by Jerome Godin.
Revised September 2008
|
------------------------------------------------------------ |

|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
HORAC VALUES OF VARIOUS LIQUIDS
|
|
HORAC is the measure of Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging and
the scores are expressed as
moles CAE/L. The Hydroxyl Radical is the most dangerous
of all free radical species. Cantron ASV is far superior
to all versions, variations and other known hydroxyl scavenging
compounds, followed by Cantron New Millenium Version.
|
ORAC VALUES OF VARIOUS ANTIOXIDANT JUICES AND LIQUID
CANTRON (ORAC VALUE PER LITER)
|
|
ORAC is the measure of Peroxyl Scavenging
and scores are expressed as
moles TE/L. The Peroxyl Radical is the most abundant free
radical. Cantron ASV has the highest score followed by
the original Cantron version.
|
Antioxidants, Free Radicals and
the different types of Free Radicals
|
Click here
to skip the information section and go directly
to the Cantron Antioxidant Report ->
|
What Are Free Radicals?
|
In the most simplistic terms, free radicals are
unstable molecules inside the body that attack
stable molecular structures. When chronic and
in the absence of sufficient defenses, these attacks
cause damage to healthy tissues, organs, cell
membranes, blood vessels, proteins, fats, carbohydrates
and even DNA strands within the cell. This resultant
damage has a cumulative effect and can lead to
many disease states. Degradation of DNA in cells
caused by free radicals has serious biological
consequences such as mutation, carcinogenic transformation,
pathologies and cellular aging. It is even reported
that free radicals may lead to programmed cell
death (apoptosis).
According to the National Cancer Institute (http://www.cancer.gov):
“Free radicals are molecules with incomplete
electron shells which make them more chemically
reactive than those without incomplete electron
shells. In humans the most common form of free
radicals is oxygen. When an oxygen molecule (O2)
becomes electrically charged or "radicalized"
it tries to steal electrons from other molecules,
causing damage to the DNA and other molecules.
Over time, such damage may become irreversible
and lead to disease including cancer.”
Note: If you read our last
antioxidant report, you may notice that many things
have changed. Tests for peroxynitrite radicals
and scores for superoxide radicals were not available
at that time and are now included in this new
report. Regarding the HORAC scores, the standard
has changed from Gallic acid equivalent to Caffeic
acid equivalent. The conversion is the Gallic
acid score times 1.5. All previous scores have
been converted accordingly. Dr. Hetrick, who has
passed away since his initial work on this project
adjusted the different scores for formula density.
Our current team of scientists believed it was
better to record the raw scores and not adjust
for density. Most importantly, the new Cantron®
ASV version has been tested and it dramatically
outperforms all other versions and variations
of this formula with "off the chart"
results.
Brunswick Biomedical Technologies
Lab- who tested our formulations- describes the
effects of free radical damage accordingly: “Overall,
free radicals have been implicated in the development
of at least 50 diseases! A partial list
includes arthritis and other inflammatory diseases,
kidney disease, cataracts, inflammatory bowel
disease, colitis, lung dysfunction, pancreatitis,
drug reactions, skin lesions and aging to mention
a few. Heart disease and cancer are two of the
most widespread diseases associated with free
radical damage. Heart disease is the leading cause
of death in America today, killing an estimated
one in every three Americans. Literally,
free radicals are the major factor of aging.”
|
|
Other disease states of which free radicals
are responsible for are Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s
disease, lupus, atherosclerosis, strokes, rheumatoid arthritis,
age-related hearing loss, liver disease, age associated
neurological disorders, retinopathy, macular degeneration,
TMJ symptoms, cerebral palsy, Down’s syndrome, ALS,
sepsis, Huntington’s disease, loss of skin elasticity
(breakdown of collagen), and the list is still growing
as ongoing research continues.
There are more than 300 theories to explain
the aging phenomenon. Among all theories, the free radical
theory of aging, postulated first by Dr. Denham Harman
at the University Of Nebraska, is the most popular and
widely tested. Aging is thought to occur as a result of
constant exposure to Reactive Oxygen Species of free radicals
with a cumulative damage, through the entire life, along
with the gradually decreasing repair capacity and increasing
degenerative changes in the organs, tissues and individual
cells. The body has enzymes, which can repair much of
the damaged proteins, but when these enzymes become damaged
themselves, repair processes are compromised.
“It is difficult these days to open
any medical journal and not find some paper on the role
of "Reactive Oxygen Species" or "free radicals"
in human disease. The species have been implicated in
over 50 diseases. This large number suggests that radicals
are not something esoteric, but that they participate
as a fundamental component of tissue injury in most, if
not all, human diseases.” ...from the American Journal
of Medicine, Sept 30, 1991 v91 n3C p12S (9); Oxidants
and Antioxidants: Pathophysiologic Determinants and Therapeutic
agents, Author: Halliwell, Barry.
|
What Causes Free Radicals?
|
There are
many internal andexternal factors which form free radicals:
tobacco smoke, excessive alcohol, radiation including
ultraviolet radiation from the sun, auto exhaust, pesticides,
herbicides, pollution, prescription drug use, chemotherapy,
surgery, breakdown of bacteria by white blood cells, microbial
or viral infections, metabolism of toxins, inflammatory
processes, byproducts of oxygen metabolism, stress, shock,
trauma, hypoxia, enzymatic reactions, calorie consumption,
poor diet and many food materials especially oxidizing hydrogenated
oils.
A single free radical can
destroy an enzyme, a protein molecule, a strand of DNA,
or an entire cell, but even worse, in a nano-second it can
unleash torrential chain reactions in our bodies. Each free
radical can initiate and perpetuate millions of other free
radicals, setting off chains of biologically damaging reactions.
This damage is at the molecular and cellular levels. Ironically,
the underlying mechanisms that most chemotherapeutic agents
and ionizing radiation have is not to neutralize free radicals
but to produce more free radicals which leads to irreversible
tissue injury.
|
What Are Antioxidants?
|
In the most simplistic terms, the role
of antioxidants is to interact with free radicals and
"quench" them or render them harmless. Researchers
believe that increased dietary intake of antioxidants
can slow the process of free radical damage and associated
disorders. By removing free radicals, antioxidants help
to: protect against DNA damage in cells, protect cell
membranes, protect against all forms of cancer, protect
the brain against various forms of dementia, protect against
the harmful cross-linking of proteins with sugars that
cause cell damage and may help slow the aging process.
Antioxidants have been shown to provide: blood vessel
strength and protection, enhanced memory and learning
function, healthy lung function, bone and joint flexibility.
According to the National Cancer Institute,
“Antioxidants are substances that may protect cells
from the damage caused by unstable molecules known as
free radicals. Free radical damage may lead to cancer.
The antioxidants interact with and stabilize free radicals
and may prevent some of the damage free radicals otherwise
might cause. Considerable laboratory evidence from chemical,
cell culture, and animal studies indicate that antioxidants
may slow or possibly prevent the development of cancer.
Antioxidants are often described as "mopping up"
free radicals, meaning they neutralize the electrical
charge and prevent the free radical from taking electrons
from other molecules."
US Federal Courts have recently instructed
the FDA to allow the claim that antioxidants may prevent
cancer (Whitaker vs. Thompson {2002}, Pearson vs. Shalala
{1999} and Pearson vs. Shalala 2 {2001}). These landmark
rulings benefit the general public, which now has access
to this extremely important health information that may
help millions of people reduce the risk of this dreaded
disease and live longer as a result of using antioxidants
in their diet.
Two principal mechanisms of action have
been proposed for antioxidants, first is stabilizing free
radical present in the system, and the second mechanism
involves the removal of chain initiating catalysts. Furthermore,
antioxidants can act by scavenging biologically important
reactive oxygen species, by preventing their formation,
or by repairing the damage that they do. Antioxidants
can suppress apoptosis (programmed cell death), act as
reducing agents, chelate metal compounds and affect directly
or indirectly the expression of genes in tissues. A diet
high in antioxidants may even bolster the body’s
own defenses against biological invaders transmitted by
germ warfare, mosquitoes or other delivery methods.
The body's arsenal of antioxidants appear
to be sufficient for keeping oxidation in check in children
and in youths, but once we reach our 20's, the effectiveness
of the body's antioxidants defense mechanisms lessen and
free radicals are given greater rein to do damage. For
example, the antioxidant enzyme, superoxide dismutase,
appears to diminish with age and the antioxidant capacity
in human plasma decreases. While the body’s antioxidant
defenses are reduced, the number of free radicals in the
body rises dramatically. Studies also show that cells
from old individuals are more susceptible to oxidative
damage than cells from younger donors and that some of
this damage can actually be prevented by antioxidants.
Researchers found that cancer patients
with small cell lung cancer who used antioxidants showed
increased long-term survival rates as compared with previously
published studies. It was also noticed that patients receiving
antioxidants were able to tolerate chemotherapy and radiation
treatment well. It was concluded that antioxidant treatment
could potentiate orthodox cancer treatments by decreasing
the likelihood of side effects and increasing the host
immune defense. Ralph Moss, PhD, author of the best selling
book, “The Cancer Industry,” former assistant
director of public affairs at Memorial Sloan-Kettering
Cancer Center, and producer for several documentaries,
including, “The Cancer War,” stated in his
newsletter of 8/17/2003; “I would argue that the
preponderance of evidence already suggests that antioxidants
reduce the side effects of chemotherapy and radiation,
without, however, interfering with their effectiveness.
As the body’s own antioxidant defenses
are gradually overwhelmed by the aging process or disease
or both, fruits, vegetables, herbs, spices, and concentrated
dietary supplements should be consumed as they contain
the largest amounts of antioxidants to help replenish
and augment the system.
|
Various Forms of Free Radicals and
Antioxidants
|
There are many common reactive species
of free radicals existing in the body. Radicals of oxygen
compromise the variety of reactive molecules that can
constitute oxidative stress to the cells. The reactive
oxygen species include the peroxyl radical, hydroxyl radical,
peroxynitrite radical and the superoxide ion.
As free radicals are all different, likewise,
all antioxidants are not alike. Not only do antioxidants
differ in their potency but also on what type of free
radicals they work upon. For example, Vitamin C only works
on water-soluble peroxyl radicals, vitamin E scavenges
fat-soluble peroxyls, superoxide dismutase and catalase
is only effective on superoxide radicals, etc. It is rare
to find an antioxidant that can work effectively on more
than one type of radical let alone all 5 forms of the
harmful reactive oxygen species. To properly understand
the significance of our independent study, a brief discussion
of the reactive oxygen species that Cantron® was tested
on is necessary.
|
The Peroxyl Radical –
The Most Abundant Free Radical
|
Peroxyl radicals are the most abundant
free radicals in the human body and have been suggested
as a major cause of atherosclerosis, cancer, liver disease,
Alzheimer’s disease, hearing loss and the aging
process. There are two types: water-soluble and lipid
(fat) - soluble.
Free radicals attack all major classes
of bio-molecules, but lipids are the most susceptible
and the easiest to damage. The peroxyl radical species
is reasonably stable and not very reactive but they are
reactive enough, however, to attack adjacent fatty acid
side chains, as well as enzymes, receptors, and other
structures found in cell membranes. The cell membrane
is a rich source of polyunsaturated fatty acids, which
are easily attacked by oxidizing radicals including the
peroxyl radical. The destruction of polyunsaturated fats
causes damage by unleashing a chain reaction of chemical
events that can collapse cell membranes. Once one peroxyl
free radical forms and an appropriate antioxidant is not
available to stop the process, the chain of events keeps
occurring until the cell membrane literally collapses.
As the cellular membrane becomes compromised, the cell
bursts open, spews its contents and dies. This series
of damaging breaks in the cellular membrane can be prevented
by antioxidant defenses and the cells can remain intact.
However, it has been demonstrated that total peroxyl radical
scavenging antioxidant capacity (TRAP) in human plasma
decreases with age.
Peroxyls are formed by several routes
especially during the breakdown of organic peroxides,
oxidation of lipids or other organic molecules in oxidative
stress. They are formed within the delicate cellular membrane.
If a free radical within or on the outside of a cell attacks
the fatty acid cell membrane structures, they create peroxyl
free radicals. These radicals are also formed as a byproduct
of the clash between hydroxyl radicals and polyunsaturated
fatty acids derived from vegetable oils.
|
The Hydroxyl Radical – The
Most Dangerous Free Radical
|
Of all the reactive oxygen species (ROS),
the hydroxyl reactive oxygen species is the most reactive.
It is, in fact, the most reactive radical known to chemistry
and the most physiologically harmful, being suspected
in such pathologies as atherosclerosis, oncogenesis, cataractulargenesis
and DNA mutation.
These dangerous radicals can attack and
damage almost every molecule found in living cells because
they react as soon as they come in contact with another
molecule. Since it is so reactive, hydroxyl radicals generated
in vivo do not persist for even a microsecond as they
rapidly combine with molecules in their immediate vicinity
as fast as they collide. Hydroxyl radicals can be produced
at an enormous rate, have easy access to every portion
of the cell, are capable of causing great damage within
a small radius of their site of production and are highly
carcinogenic. In addition to damaging unsaturated fats
in cell membranes, hydroxyls are reactive enough, aggressive
enough, and persist long enough to damage the less susceptible
proteins (including the fragmentation of vital proteins
in plasma), nuclear acids, enzymes and carbohydrates.
Russell Reiter, PhD, professor of neuroendocrinology
at University of Texas Health Center has highlighted the
dangers of the hydroxyl radical; "If the function
of radicals is to destroy molecules and tissues, then
the hydroxyl radical would be the radical’s radical.
It reacts at diffusion rates with virtually any molecule
found in its path including macromolecules such as DNA,
membrane lipids, proteins and carbohydrates. In
terms of DNA, the hydroxyl radical can induce strand breaks
as well as chemical changes in the dioxyribose and in
the purine and pyrirnidine bases. Damaged proteins, many
of them crucial enzymes in neurons lose their efficiency
and cellular function wanes. Protein oxidation in many
tissues, including the brain, has been proposed as an
explanation for the functional deficits associating with
aging."
In addition to the direct damage caused
by hydroxyls, they play a major role in forming peroxyl
radicals and stimulating the free radical chain reaction
known as lipid peroxidation. Peroxyl radicals are formed
when oxygen combines with the hydrogen radical. One hydroxyl
radical can result in the conversion of many hundred fatty
acids side chains into lipid hydroperoxides. As hydroxyl
radicals react with carbohydrates it leads to chain breaks
in important molecules in a process involving the peroxyl
radical as an intermediate. Since hydroxyls do such direct
damage, work in conjunction with and create harmful peroxyl
radicals, then supplementation of hydroxyl scavenging
antioxidants may be extremely important.
|
The Peroxynitrite Radical –
Leading Cause of Damaged Proteins
|
Peroxynitrite is a strong oxidant that
attacks proteins, cysteines and methionines. It is an
especially dangerous type of free radical consisting of
both oxygen and nitrogen. It plays a role in the
development of diabetes, atherosclerosis, lung disease,
chronic inflammation, neurological disorders, peripheral
neuropathy- a common complication of diabetes, multiple
sclerosis, erectile dysfunction, hypertension, BPH, ischemic
heart disease, depression and rheumatoid arthritis. Several
years ago there was a public scare about consuming foods
with nitrites like bacon because they cause cancer.
Peroxynitrite is a potent oxidant formed
by the rapid reaction between nitric oxide and superoxide
radical. The peroxynitrite anion is relatively stable,
but they can rapidly potentate to peroxynitrous acid an
unstable species, which decomposes with a half-life about
one second at pH 7.4. Peroxynitrite can serve as a precursor
for other potent reactive species, including nitrogen
dioxide and is one of the potent reactive metabolites
for the initiation of lipid peroxidation.
|
The Superoxide Radical – The
Greatest Initiator of the other Free Radical Species
|
The Superoxide Radical can cause
damage to the hereditary material (DNA) and propagate
cancer cells. It is implicated in cataracts, macular degeneration,
atherosclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis and joint inflammation.
In the presence of superoxide anions, Low Density Lipoprotein
(LDL) deposited on arterial cell walls undergo peroxidation,
become fibrous, then calcified, thereby, blocking blood
flow. Synovial fluids in joints are oxidized by superoxide;
unfortunately joint fluids lack sufficient superoxide
dismutase.
Superoxide is the most important source
of initiating radicals in vivo. Once you get a superoxide
radical you are going to have radicals propagating damage
throughout the biological system until you have a termination-that
is-until that superoxide radical and all resultant radicals
are quenched. Therefore in biological systems, the superoxide
anion is a very important free radical. The superoxide
anion is not a particularly reactive molecule and it can
diffuse considerable distances from its site of production.
The greatest danger from superoxide is that these radicals
can be converted to more damaging radicals by a chain
reaction. They combine with other reactive species such
as nitric oxide to yield more reactive species such as
peroxynitrite radicals and they give rise to the highly
reactive hydroxyl radical species. As previously mentioned
the hydroxyl is the most reactive and physiologically
harmful free radical.
The body utilizes important antioxidants
to deal with superoxide radicals, in particular the enzyme
Superoxide Dismustase (SOD). Decreased SOD favors Superoxide
anion formation. This antioxidant is so necessary that
its very absence would be lethal. The problem is that
SOD levels in the body decline with age and supplementation
with SOD tablets is not that effective because they are
poorly absorbed into the bloodstream.
|
To Recap
|
* It is a well-established fact that free
radicals have been implicated in over 50 degenerative
diseases including heart disease, cancer and aging.
* Consumption of antioxidants may eradicate
dangerous free radicals and help prevent disease.
* The federal court has forced the FDA to
allow the claim that antioxidants may prevent cancer.
* The body’s storehouse of antioxidants
diminish with age and leads to the onset of disease and
premature aging.
* There are many forms of free radicals.
Peroxyl radicals are the most abundant, hydroxyl radicals
are the most dangerous, peroxynitrite attacks proteins,
and superoxide anions are the greatest initiator of other
dangerous free radicals.
* One free radical engenders many other free
radicals, causing a chain reaction of biological events.
* Cantron® is not only the most potent
antioxidant known to man, but works against a number of
radicals that are responsible for multitudes of diseases
in men.
* To obtain the equivalent antioxidant protection
of just one daily dose of Cantron® (1 ½ teaspoons
or 6 capsules), one would have to consume megadoses of
vitamin C or E for it peroxyl scavenging activities, many
cups of concentrated green tea with 95% polyphenols for
its hydroxyl radical scavenging ability, megadoses of
alpha-lipoic acid for its peroxynitrite scavenging ability
and mega-doses of superoxide dismutase and/or catalase
tablets for its superoxide scavenging ability.
* Supplementation of antioxidants, along
with a healthy diet of antioxidant foods and beverages
should be exercised by anyone who values good health or
who is seeking “Wellness.” A wide variety
of antioxidant substances are recommended in our “Cantron®
Total Wellness Program” and our “Cantron®
Total Wellness Diet.”
|
|
--------------------------------------------------------------
|
Cantron®: Laboratory Studies of its Scavenging Abilities against the Reactive Oxygen Species of Free Radicals |
(peroxyl radical hydro and lipo, hydroxyl radical, peroxynitrite radical and superoxide anion)
|
Cantron® has been known to be a powerful antioxidant. Research was needed, however, to determine just how potent Cantron® is in relation to other powerful antioxidants and to ascertain which types of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) it works upon. Most antioxidants usually scavenge only one specific type of radical species; for example, vitamin C only works upon water-soluble peroxyl radicals (hydro) and has no effect upon fat-soluble (lipo) peroxyl radicals, hydroxyl radicals, or superoxide radicals.
Nutraceutical chemistry consultant, Daniel Hetrick, PhD., was originally commissioned to design, implement and oversee this project. Tests were conducted on 4 separate versions of the Cantron® formula and 5 other known variations:
|
1. Cantron® Advanced Scientific Formula (ASV) (Dec. 2008 to present)
2. Cantron® New Millennium Formula (October 1999 to present)
3. Cantron® Original Formula (Cancell equivalent - 1984 to 1999)
4. Cantron® Experimental Formula (2003- never introduced to public)
5. Entelev - 1982 vintage - (manufactured by Jim Sheridan)
6. Cancell – 1988 vintage- (manufactured by Ed Sopcak)
7. Protocel – JVS-23 Formula (2001 to present)
8. Protocel – EJS-50 Formula (2002 to present)
9. Pre- Protocel (manufactured by Protocel chemist and associate-TB)
|
Before the original tests were conducted, the results of the different variations were not expected to vary widely, if at all, because all versions and variations have the same ingredients. Only the quantities and ratios of those ingredients varied slightly.
All formulas were tested for their activity on peroxyl and hydroxyl radicals. Cantron® ASV was also tested for its activity on peroxynitrite and superoxide radicals.
|
• Peroxyl radical scores are measured in the ORAC test (Oxygen Radical Absorption Capacity)
• Hydroxyl Radicals are tested in the HORAC test (Hydroxyl Radical Absorption Capacity)
• Peroxynitrite Radicals are tested in the NORAC test (Peroxynitrite Radical Absorption Capacity)
• Superoxide Radicals are measured in the SOD test (Superoxide Radical Absorption Capacity)
|
In 2003 samples of all products except Cantron ASV were sent to Brunswick Laboratories in Wareham, MA. Samples of ASV were sent in July 2007. Brunswick Laboratories maintains a state of the art facility with highly skilled scientists. Brunswick serves the nutraceutical, pharmaceutical, food and cosmetic industries. Their antioxidant team developed proprietary high throughput technologies in antioxidant screening and has accumulated the world’s largest antioxidant database on a wide variety of natural product compounds. Their expertise has made them a leader in antioxidant activity profiles. Brunswick Labs is the inventor of the improved and automated ORAC assay (US patent Pending). This assay is the second generation of the ones used by the National Institute of Health and US Department of Agriculture and is more accurate than its predecessors. Brunswick screens natural products, antioxidant supplements, beverages, pure chemicals, plasma, serum, and urine in their antioxidant assays.
|
Total ORAC Scores |
Cantron and all Other Versions and Variations
ORAC is a measure of free radical scavenging potential of dangerous peroxyl hydro and peroxyl lipo radicals |
Version/Variation
(Ranking from
Highest to Lowest) |
Brunswick
ID # |
ORAC
Score
TE/L
|
# Times
More
Potent
Than
Vitamin E Standard
(3995) |
# Times
More
Potent
Than
Vitamin C Standard
(5000) |
# Times
More
Potent
Than
OJ
(7400) |
Cantron®,
Advanced Scientific Version
Lot # 05020124008 |
07-2806 |
2,083,457 |
522 |
417 |
282 |
Cantron®
Original Version
1997 vintage
Lot # 61797 |
03-709 |
1,798,752 |
450 |
360 |
243 |
Cancell,
1988 vintage Sopcak
No Lot # |
03-710 |
1,727,173 |
432 |
345 |
233 |
Protocel
JVS-23 |
03-1251 |
1,218,247 |
305 |
244 |
165 |
Protocel
EJS-50 |
03-1252 |
1,158,975 |
290 |
232 |
157 |
Pre-Protocel
(TB) |
03-1253 |
1,150,441 |
288 |
230 |
155 |
Cantron®,
Experimental Version
Lot # 322363E |
03-223 |
991,783 |
248 |
198 |
134 |
Cantron®,
New Millennium Version
Lot # 322363 |
03-222 |
945,705 |
237 |
189 |
128 |
Entelev,
1982 Sheridan,
Lot #102-L |
03-708 |
783,386 |
196 |
157 |
106 |
|
Evaluation of the ORAC Scores
|
The ORAC test measures the antioxidant activity against peroxyl radicals by determining how many peroxyl free radicals can be absorbed by a given antioxidant as compared to the vitamin E analog- Trolox and is expressed as micromoles of Trolox equivalent per liter (TE/L). The ORAC score for the Trolox vitamin E equivalent is 3995 TE/L.
The different versions and variations had a wide divergence of scores, which was quite unexpected at that time the original samples were sent in 2003. Samples of ASV were sent in July 2007.
Of all the samples sent in 2003, Cantron® original version scored the highest with an ORAC score of 1,798,752. Cancell scored a virtually identical 1,727,173 as was expected because of its chemical equivalence. All three Protocel formulas scored virtually the same indicating that they are chemically equivalent to each other, not separate formulas as they are promoted. Their scores were also significantly lower than Cancell and the original Cantron formula. Protocel JVS-23 is promoted as the original Entelev formula, but its scores are markedly different than the Entelev score in this test. Furthermore, Protocel EJS-50 is promoted as the original Cancell formula but its scores are well below the Cancell ORAC scores. The new Cantron® ASV scored the highest of all versions and variations. It scored a whopping 2,083,457-virtually twice as much as the Protocel formulas and three times as much as the original Entelev.
|
How Effective is Cantron ASV on Peroxyl Radicals?
|
Cantron® ASV with its score of 2,083,457 is 522 times more effective than the score of 3,995 for the vitamin E equivalent standard (Trolox). When compared to other liquid antioxidants in Brunswick's database, its scores are “off the charts." For example, orange juice-a well-known antioxidant-has a score of 7,400 (see the chart of ORAC values for various antioxidant juices). The highest score for a liquid antioxidant in Brunswick's database is pomegranate juice which scored 90,894. Cantron ASV scores are therefore 282 times higher than that of orange juice, 133 times higher than grape juice and 23 times higher than pomegranate juice.
|
HORAC Scores |
Cantron® and All Versions and Other Variations
The Hydroxyl Radical is the most dangerous of all radicals. HORAC measures Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging Ability |
Version/Variation
(Ranking from Highest
to Lowest) |
Brunswick
ID # |
HORAC
Score
CAE/L |
# Times more Potent than Green Tea
(4219) |
# Times More Potent Than the
Caffeic Acid Standard
(5551) |
Cantron®,
Advanced Scientific Version
Lot # 05020124008 |
07-2806 |
288,325 |
68 |
52 |
Cantron®,
New Millennium Version
Lot # 322363 |
03-222 |
59,085 |
14 |
11 |
Protocel
JVS-23 |
03-1251 |
50,963 |
12 |
9 |
Protocel
EJS-50 |
03-1252 |
49,734 |
12 |
9 |
Pre-Protocel
(TB) |
03-1253 |
49,718 |
12 |
9 |
Cantron®,
Experimental Version
Lot # 322363E |
03-223 |
43,659 |
10 |
8 |
Cantron®
Original Version
1997 vintage
Lot # 61797 |
03-709 |
308 |
<1 |
<1 |
Cancell,
1988 vintage Sopcak
No Lot # provided |
03-710 |
281 |
<1 |
<1 |
Entelev,
1982 vintage Sheridan
Lot #102 |
03-708 |
210 |
<1 |
<1 |
|
Evaluation of the HORAC Scores
|
Whenever an antioxidant product is marketed, the manufacturer/distributor refers to the ORAC score; and scores against other free radicals are rarely published or mentioned. Since the hydroxyl radical is the most dangerous radical of all, an antioxidant that can scavenge hydroxyl radicals is the most important tool one can utilize to protect against a multitude of associated diseases.
The HORAC test measures the activity of a given antioxidant against hydroxyl radicals. Cantron® and related formulations were tested and compared to the test standard, Caffeic Acid, which has a score of 5,551. Unexpectedly, as with the ORAC scores, the HORAC scores of the various versions and variations differed widely. Of all versions and variations that were tested in 2003, the New Millennium Version was the superior scavenger of hydroxyl radicals, scoring 59,085 CAE/L (11 times the Caffeic Acid standard).
Unexpectedly, Cantron® original version and Cancell, which had the highest ORAC scores among that group, had very little effect on hydroxyl radicals, in fact, their scores were actually less than the Caffeic Acid standard. We observed what I coined as a see-saw effect, that is, the higher the ORAC score the lower the HORAC score and vice versa. Like a see-saw, when one side went up the other went down. There was one prior exception to the see-saw effect. Entelev, which had the lowest ORAC score also had little effect on hydroxyl radicals – in fact, it had the lowest HORAC score. The Cantron® ASV version; however, solves the problem of the “see-saw effect.” Not only does ASV have the highest ORAC score of all versions and variations, it also has the highest scores by a wide margin on hydroxyl radicals. The new version has "off the chart" HORAC scores as compared to the other versions and variations. In fact, ASV is 580% more effective than Protocel and 488% more effective than the Cantron "New Millennium Version,” which previously scored the highest of all versions and variations. The actual HORAC score for ASV is 288,325 CAE/L.
Just like the ORAC scores, the HORAC scores on all 3 Protocel variations were virtually identical. Despite how that product is advertised, these HORAC scores for these formulas bear no resemblance to the Cancell or Entelev scores, and is further proof that these are all the same formula with different names and not what they are advertised to be.
|
How Effective is Cantron ASV on Hydroxyl Radicals?
|
Brunswick Laboratories has compiled a vast and comprehensive antioxidant database. Green Tea was by far the greatest hydroxyl radical scavenger on their chart; in fact, it is 9.2 times more potent than the next highest antioxidant on their chart-elderberry extract. Volume for volume; however, Cantron® ASV is 52 times more powerful than the Caffeic acid standard, 68 times more powerful than Green Tea and 625 times more powerful than elderberry extract, which demonstrates its vast superiority to all other hydroxyl radical scavengers. Ingestion of this powerful hydroxyl radical scavenger is highly recommended in order to prevent or reverse serious health conditions.
|
SOD Scores |
Cantron® Advanced Scientific Version |
Version/Variation |
Brunswick
ID # |
SOD Score
unitSODeq/L |
Cantron®,
Advanced Scientific Version
Lot # 05020124008 |
07-2806 |
7,331,000 |
|
Evaluation of the SOD Scores
|
Very few substances are effective upon the extremely dangerous superoxide radicals - the greatest initiator of other dangerous free radicals; therefore, a substance that can quench superoxide radicals is absolutely necessary for good health. The enzymes superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase are the body’s own natural defense mechanisms to protect against superoxide radicals. Without these enzymes in the system we would all die – that is how important it is to quench this dangerous radical species. Unfortunately, however, the amount of these enzymes in the system diminishes markedly as we age or when we experience challenging health conditions. Supplementation of SOD is problematic because it does not absorb well.
In 2003, Brunswick Laboratories did not have an assay to quantify the activity of an antioxidant on superoxide radicals. Therefore, we sent samples of all the versions and variations to Cayman Laboratories in Ann Arbor Michigan. They had an assay to measure whether or not an antioxidant substance destroyed superoxide radicals by inserting the test samples after the generation of superoxide anions, but before the addition of SOD. Thus if the test samples inactivated the superoxide anion, activity of SOD would be less than the untreated controls. This assay did not have a quantitative assay that provided a score, but the test determined whether there was: no blocking effect, a partial blocking effect or a complete blocking effect of the superoxide radical. The reduction in SOD activity occurred with the Cantron samples and was the measure of Cantron’s ability to destroy the superoxide anions. All of the Cantron formulas completely blocked the formation of superoxide anions in that study.
In 2007 Brunswick Laboratories had already developed a quantitative assay to measure activity against Superoxide radicals. The calibration standard was SOD and was expressed as a unit SOD equivalent per liter (unitsSODeq/L). Cantron ™ ASV scored an amazingly high 7,331,000 unitsSODeq/L. This means that it is many times more effective than the SOD- the body’s own defense mechanism. ASV is also very readily absorbed into the bloodstream, where SOD is not. No other versions or variations were tested.
|
NORAC Scores |
Cantron® Advanced Scientific Version |
Version/Variation |
Brunswick ID # |
NORAC
Score
TE/L |
# Times Better Than the Trolox Equivalent Standard
(3995) |
Cantron®,
Advanced Scientific Version
Lot # 05020124008 |
07-2806 |
129,664 |
33 |
|
Evaluation of the NORAC Scores
|
The NORAC test measures the activity of a given antioxidant against peroxynitrite radicals. NORAC scores are expressed in micromoles of trolox equivalent per liter and the score for the calibration standard is 3995. In 2003 the NORAC assay was not available. In 2007 the Cantron® Advanced Scientific Version was sent to Brunswick. No other versions or variations were tested.
Peroxynitrite is a strong oxidant that attacks proteins, cysteines and methionines and can serve as a precursor for other potent reactive species, including nitrogen dioxide. Peroxynitrite is one of the potent reactive metabolites for the initiation of lipid peroxidation. Very few substances scavenge peroxynitrite radicals – alpha-lipoic acid being one of the few.
Just like the other free radical species that it was tested upon, ASV had extremely high scores against the peroxynitrite radical. The score for Cantron ASV is 129,664 TE/L – 33 times more effective than the trolox equivalent standard.
|
Measure of Phenolic Content
|
Brunswick also conducts an assay that measures the number of phenolic compounds in a formula. These are compounds that have antioxidant activity and are some of the active ingredients in the Cantron formula. The phenolic compounds are expressed in milligrams of gallic acid per liter (mgGA/L). The phenolic content of Cantron NM was measured at an incredibly high 86,659.24 mgGA/L and the results of Cantron ASV is an even higher 134,676.20. mgGA/L. ASV therefore has 155% of the amount of phenolic compounds as NM and likewise of other versions and variations.
|
Discussion of the Results-
|
The most puzzling question is why the various formulations other than ASV-which is so much more concentrated than other formulas - differ so widely in their ORAC and HORAC scores. As the components are the same and the ratios and concentrations of the ingredients are not that different, results were expected to be similar or the same. With only one exception (1982 Entelev), an inverse relationship or "seesaw" effect was manifested, i.e., whenever the HORAC went up, the ORAC simultaneously went down and vice versa.
As expected, because the 1997 Cantron® original version and the 1988 Cancell utilized the same manufacturing procedure, their performance was virtually the same, albeit, 97 Cantron® was slightly but not significantly more effective. Before ASV, these two samples had the highest ORAC scores (Cantron® original version 1,798,752 to Cancell's 1,727,173), but were among the lowest HORAC scores (Cantron® 308, Cancell 281), and they were equally effective against superoxide anions (Cantron® -.66, Cancell -.67) in the Cayman Laboratories assay. The similar behavior of these two samples on all 3 radicals certainly proves that they are virtually identical, with 97 Cantron® being slightly superior in its scavenging abilities to the Cancell.
The biggest surprise was how vastly different the Cancell formula was from Protocel EJS-50 which is advertised to be the Cancell equivalent. Cancell's HORAC is 281 vs. 49,718 for the EJS-50 while Cancell's ORAC is 1,727,173 to EJS-50's 1,158,975. If these were equivalent formulas, they would behave the same. Therefore, it is apparent from these studies that EJS-50 is not Cancell. Likewise, despite being promoted as the Entelev equivalent, JVS-23 behaved much differently than Sheridan’s Entelev. All 3 Protocel formulas behave exactly the same on both peroxyl and hydroxyl radicals and therefore the only logical conclusion that can be made is that they are chemically identical- not different formulas as they are promoted.
|
Conclusion-
|
Cantron® has an extremely high phenolic content and all versions and variations of the formula have astonishingly high antioxidant activity against a wide variety of free radicals. Some of the formulas were more active on peroxyl radicals, while others were more effective against hydroxyl radicals. Cantron ASV had the highest values across the board on all radical species and is by far the best antioxidant product of the group. Furthermore, by quenching the initiating radicals ASV may also help prevent the formation of other dangerous radicals such as, hydrogen peroxide and singlet oxygen, which were not tested.
ASV scored well on both types of peroxyl radicals (hydro and lipo) something that is extremely rare and the total ORAC score is 23 times higher than the next best peroxyl radical scavenger in Brunswick’s data base (pomegranate juice).
Also this “Advanced Version” had “off the charts” scores on hydroxyl radicals - the most dangerous radicals known to chemistry and an initiator of peroxyl radicals. In fact it is 5 times more effective than the second best hydroxyl scavenger Cantron NM. One could argue that by scavenging more hydroxyl radicals, Cantron ASV will also prevent further peroxyl radicals from forming (hydroxyls create peroxyls). Each hydroxyl radical that is allowed to exist without being scavenged can cause chain reactions and propagate thousands or even millions of additional peroxyl radicals.
Superoxide anions also create other dangerous radicals and propagate a chain of dangerous free radicals such as peroxynitrite radicals. They also give rise to the highly reactive hydroxyl radical species. In fact superoxide is the largest initiator of other free radicals. The body’s defense mechanism - SOD - greatly diminishes with age, and with severe health challenges. SOD supplementation is problematic as it does not absorb well. ASV is much more effective than SOD and absorbs well also.
Peroxynitrite radical scavengers are rare and ASV fits the bill. It is 33 times more effective than the test standard. It is important to scavenge nitrite radicals because they attack proteins, cysteines and methionines and can serve as a precursor for other potent reactive species, including nitrogen dioxide. Peroxynitrite is one of the potent reactive metabolites for the initiation of lipid peroxidation.
Accumulation of damaged, mutated and foreign proteins in the tissues, organs, joints and bloodstream are also a result of free radicals. Removing and scavenging these bad proteins from the system allows healing and reversal of severe health conditions.
Cantron ASV is the world’s most effective and versatile antioxidant in the world. It should be taken by anyone who wishes to prevent or reverse damage caused by free radicals and damaged, mutated and foreign proteins.
This article is for information purposes only. The FDA has not evaluated the statements in this article or the research results.
|
Bibliography
|
NCI Fact Sheet: Antioxidants and Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, cancer.gov, posted date Wed Jan 08, 2003
Brunswick Laboratories, www.Brunswicklabs.com
Nutritional Antioxidants: Mechanisms of Action, Analyses of Activities and Medical Applications. Jacob Vaya and Michael Aviram. Laboratory of Natural Medicinal compounds, Migal-Galilee Technological Center, Kiryat Shmona 10200, Israel and the Lipid Research Laboratory, Rambam Medical Center, Technion Faculty of Medicine and Rappaport Institute for Research in the Medical Sciences, Haifa, 31096 Israel.
National Library of Medicine, PubMed, Biochem J 224 (3): 697-701 (Dec 15 1984), Ferrous ion-EDTA- Stimulated Phospholipid Peroxidation. A Reaction Changing from Alkoxyl-Radical- to Hydroxy-lRadical Dependent Initiation., Gutteridge JM
Reactive Oxygen Species In Living Systems: Source, Biochemistry, and Role in Human Disease. (Oxidants and Antioxidants: Pathophysiologic Determinants and Therapeutic agents) Authors:Halliwell, Barry:American Journal of Medicine, Sept 30, 1991 v91 n3C p12S (9)
Free Radicals as the Main Cause of Aging: Age-Associated Changes of Superoxide Dismutase and Catalase Activities in the Brain. J Biomed Sci 2000 Nov;7(6):466-474 Tsay H, Wang P, Wang S, Ku H, Institute of Neuroscience, National Yang-Ming University, Taiwan, ROC.
J AOAC Int 2000 jul-aug;83(4):950-6, Analysis of Botanicals and Dietary Supplements for Antioxidant Capacity: a Review. Prior RL, Cao G, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA 02111, USA.
Brain Res 2000 June 2;866(1-2);211-7, Antioxidant Rich Diets Improve Cerebellar Physiology and Motor Learning in Aged Rats. Bickford PC, Gould T, Briederick L, Chadman K, Pollock A, Young D, Shukitt-Hale B, Joseph J, Department of Pharmacology, Boston, Massachusetts, U.S.A.
Int J Dev Neurosci 2000 Jul-Aug;18(4-5);367-81, Neurobehavioral Aspects of Antioxidant in Aging. Cantuti-Castelvetri I, Shukitt-Hale B, Joseph JA
Laryngoscope 2000 May;1 10(5 pt 1):727-38, Effects of Dietary Restrictions and Antioxidants on Presbyacusis, Department of Otolaryngology -Head and Neck Surgery, Henry Ford Health System, West Bloomfield, MI 48323, USA
Panminerva Med 1999 Dec;41(4):335-9, Free Radicals: Important Cause of Pathologies Refer to Aging. Venarucci D, Venarucci V, Vallese A, Batilla L, Casado A, De la Torre R, Lopez Fernandez ME, Center of Clinical Chemistry, I.N.R.C.A., Scientific Institute for Hospitilization and Therapy, Fermo, Italy
Endocrine 1999 Aug;11 (1):41-8, Antioxidative Mechanisms and Plasma Growth Hormone Levels: Potential Relationships in the Aging Process. Brown-Borg HM, Bode AM, Bartke A, Department of Physiology, University of North Dakota School of Medicine and Health sciences, Grand Forks 58203-9037, USA.
Life Science 1999;65(18-19):1883-92, E levated Oxidative Stress in Models of Normal Brain Aging and Alzheimer’s Disease. Butterfield DA, Howard B, Yatin S, Koppal T, Drake J, Hensley K, Aksenov M, Aksenova M, Subramaniam R, Varadarajan S, Harris-White ME, Pdigo NW Jr, Carney JM, Department of Chemistry, Center of Membrane Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40506-0055, USA.
Mutat Res 1999 Jul 16;428(1-2):17-22, Reactive Oxygen Species: The Unavoidable Environmental Insult? Gracy RW, Talent JM, Kong Y, Conrad CC, Molecular Aging Unit, Department of Molecular Biology andIimmunology, University of North Texas Health Sciences Center, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Exp Gerontol 1999 June;34(3):293-303, The Aging Paradox: Free Radical Theory of Aging, Department of Biochemistry J.N. Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, UP, India.
The Peroxyl Radical; Michael L. Ott, Department of Chemistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, 7. February 2001
Med Hypotheses 1998 Nov;51(5):405-9, Antioxidant Inhibitors for Cancer Therapy, Kong Q, Lillehei KO, Department of Surgery, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver A. 0262, USA.
Oxygen Radicals, Pro-Oxidants and Antioxidant Nutrients. Health World Online, Interview with Dr. Lester Packer, interviewed by Richard A. Passwater, Ph.D.,
Mr. Sc. Suzana Borovic, Department of Molecular Medicine, Ruder Boskovic Institute, Zagreb, Croatia, Monitoring Influence of Surgical Stress on Formation of Hydroxyl Radicals in Tumor Bearing Rats by Measuring Salicylic Acid Metabolites.
Life Extension Magazine, December 1995: The Dangerous Hydroxyl Radical
Involvement of Free Radicals and Dementia of the Alzheimer’s type: a Hypothesis, Volicer L, Crino PB, Neurobiological Aging 1990 Sep-Oct;11(5):567-71.Evaluation of Hydroxyl Radical Scavenging Abilities of Two Dietary Antioxidant Supplements, Microhydrin and MegaHydrin by Fe-EDTA Induced 2-hydroxyterephthalate Flourometric Analysys, Cory J. Stephanson, Department of Chemistry, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities G. Patrick Flanagan, Flantech Group, Cottonwood, AZ
Free Radicals and Antioxidants by BrendaMitus, http:/faculty.gvsu.cdu/gillesr/HS495-1.html.
The Moss Reports Newsletter, 8/17/03, Ralph moss
Drug discovery V.6 #1 Jan 2003, Industry Insider, Alzheimer’s disease: When Free Radicals Run Amok, D. Allan Butterfield, Professor of Chemistry, Director of the Center of Membrane Sciences, and Faculty Associate at the Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
Substance May Lessen Hearing Loss From Noise, By Malcolm Ritter: The Associated Press 10/12/2003Oxidative Stress Including Glutathione, A Peptide For Cellular Defense Against Oxidative Stress: James A. Thomas, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Iowa State University, Ames IA 50011
Free Radicals and Antioxidants; Brenda Mitus, http://faculty.gvsu.cdu/HS495-1.html
TMJ Pain May Be Aggravated by Free Radicals, Relieved Partly by Antioxidants; Jack Challem, The Nutrition Reporter, www. Nutritionreporter.com/tmj disease.html.
Melatonin in the Prevention and Control of Cancer, Russel Reiter, PhD, Endocrinology, Wake Forest College
Propofol is a Peroxynitrite Scavenger; Anesth Analg 1997; 84:1127-9; Sibel Kahraman, MD, and Abdullah T. Demiryurek, PhD; Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Hacettepe University Medical School; and Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Gazi University, Anarka, Turkey. |
|
|
|
|